Like everyone else, PC Magazine asked Google for a comment in reporting the
hostile $44.6 billion bid Microsoft made for Yahoo! At the time, the company declined to comment. Now Google has posted its own response, in (what else?) a
company blog post.
Reading it, I can't help but think that Google has decided to lob a few FUD-caked monkey wrenches into the works. Consider the tone that David Drummond, senior vice president of corporate development and Google's chief legal officer, takes:
"Could Microsoft now attempt to exert the same sort of inappropriate and illegal influence over the Internet that it did with the PC?" Drummond states. "While the Internet rewards competitive innovation, Microsoft has frequently sought to establish proprietary monopolies -- and then leverage its dominance into new, adjacent markets."
All true, certainly. But where the Web is concerned, Microsoft has only really succeeded in one area: the Internet browser. In search, Google has won. In ads, Google has won. In the popular groupthink, Google is as certainly as synonymous with the Internet as anyone, although I think an argument can be made that MySpace and Facebook's social networks have influenced the development of Web apps and development as much, if not more, than Google. Microsoft's certainly part of the dialogue, but how much of that is simply trying to make sure those Web apps run in IE?
Microsoft could certainly come to dominate the Internet, but past history doesn't exactly inspire one to believe it's an inevitability.
Lance Ulanoff, who also noted this post, thinks Google sounds "surprisingly nervous" about the whole thing. I disagree. Google never sounds surprisingly nervous about anything, honestly.
Quite frankly, ...